I'm claiming that on Johannes Witvliet's second account
(<email2 anonymized>) his name is Hans but his identification states Johannes.

Before: Arbitrator UlrichSchroeter (A), Respondent: CAcert (R), Claimant: Philippe Teuwen (C1), Dominik George (C2) Johannes Witvliet (C3), Case: a20091124.2

History Log

A1

Raimond K

{+}

A2

Bart-Jan V

{+}

A3

Marcel N

A4

Teus H

{+}

A5

Wytze R

{+}

A6

Marc F

{+}

A7

Raoul B

{+}

A8

Johan S

A9

Winfried T

{+}

A10

Marco C

{+}

Discovery

... please explain WHY you need this written statement, as it should be obvious enough for anybody participating with cacert and passing the assurance-exam.. If this appears not obvious enough to all, i would like to suggest an amendment to both with wiki and the exam.

one can assume, you may not understand how to use multiple email addresses in one account, and so therefor you also didn't understand the multiple accounts problem.

As thus upcoming ruling becomes a precedense case, that one is allowed to use multiple accounts under AP regulations that relates to the understanding of this special circumstance, that its theoretical possible to use one account to enter assurance points onto the 2nd account, thus needs a record in the logs, that the user has been asked about his understanding. As I've asked you this question within the interview, but there is no recording, nor a signed statement from you, therefor I've redone this thru this re-request. As your statement becomes part of the ruling, its a strong signal to the community, that you're within the bounds of the AP regulations.

One 'project' I'm working on currently, is the 'Conflicts of Interests' (CoI) thing, that relates to board members, and is also part in the ABC's (Arbitrated Background Checks) To identify CoI's is difficult. So what one can do is to bring someone to a clear statement. Further on, if something goes wrong, the Arbitrator can compare the situation with the given statement and can identify that someone lies or not.

The multiple accounts thing is a 'hot' topic to the community and also the arbitration system. So here I as the Arbitrator has to sort out, all the facts. With your written statement, thus protects yourself from further wrong accusations and thus protects the community that here is one community member who acts within the given policy boundarys.

So therefor, with this written statement its the same like the written statement, that you are bound by the CCA and therefor you're bound to the Arbitration system and accepts the Liabilitys that are defined by the CCA.

The Arbitration system is not merely installed to punish community members. The Arbitration system is installed to have an open forum with a mediation to solve disputes and also handle system and support tasks under a 4-eyes principle view.

As written in all our init mailings in an arbitration case, so we ask all the participients in a case to maintain a positive and helpful spirit at all times! So thus includes also discussing things, to find the right answer in a case. Its an open forum, where each participiant can ask questions, to get answers.

So here again, if you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask the questions

Accounts cleanup

#

Prim Email

Sec Email

request rcvd

proposed next change

1.

A

name change request

2.

B

name change request (?!?)

3.

C

name correction solved

should be moved next

4.

D

should be moved next

5.

TempF

E

delete accnt req

#

Prim Email

Sec Email

request rcvd

proposed next change

1.

A

name change request

2.

B

name change request (?!?)

3.

TempG

C

name correction solved

should be moved next

4.

TempH

D

should be moved next

5.

TempF

E

delete accnt req

#

Prim Email

Sec Email

request rcvd

proposed next change

1.

A

C, D, E

name change request

2.

B

name change request (?!?)

3.

TempG

delete accnt req

name correction solved

4.

TempH

delete accnt req

5.

TempF

delete accnt req

Intermediate Ruling

Ruling

Frankfurt/Main, 2010-03-16

Execution

Assurance

revoked

re-applied

A11

Cedric M

{-}

A12

Michael C

{-}

A13

Marc L

{-}

A14

Phil T

{-}

{+}

A15

Ulrich S

{-}

{+}

Assurance

revoked

re-applied

A16

Teus H

{-}

{-}

A17

Bruno C

{-}

A18

Jan K

{-}

A19

Antony W

{-}

Similiar Cases

a20071023.1

Nickname used in account

a20071205.1

Spelling difference in name

a20080604.1

Shortened first name in account

a20090618.6

Quite complicated noble name does not match account

a20090618.2

User has shortened form of name in account

a20090618.12

User not registered under full name (Dutch Givennames)

a20091129.1

Adding my second first name (CPS)

Arbitrations/a20091124.2 (last edited 2010-06-16 22:19:05 by UlrichSchroeter)