- Case Number: a20091117.4
- Status: closed
- Claimants: CAcert represented by Iang
- Respondents: Nicholas Bebout
Case Manager: EvaStöwe
- Arbitrator: none because of withdraw
- Date of arbitration start: not done because of withdraw
- Date of withdraw: 2016-06-11
- Case closed: 2016-06-22
- Complaint: background check for support crew Nicholas Bebout
Support and Arbitration,
as of board meeting 20091115, and motion 20091116.3:
"Ian Grigg be appointed Support Officer temporarily,
to immediately propose candidates for background checks,
and to recommend a suitable replacement for the support
officer role ASAP."
Therefore I would like to immediately file to conduct three Arbitrated
Background Checks (ABCs) over these candidates:
Werner Dworak (possible restart of currently frozen arbitration a20090525.2?)
Javier Fernandez Almirall
Nicholas Bebout
I would like to add that at the current point in time, we have no
appointed support engineers. If possible, than, I would request as
claimant in these 3 separate cases that the process be fast, and that
where past information is relevant (such as personal knowledge, ability
to phone quickly, etc) this be considered if possible.
(Hence I post this as one mail, so CMs/Arbitrators can see the whole
picture.)
iang- Relief: TBD
Before: Arbitrator none (A), Respondent: Nicholas Bebout (R), Claimant: CAcert represented by Iang (C), Case: a20091117.4
History Log
- 2009-11-17 dispute filed
- 2016-06-11 (later CM): asks C if case should be continued
- 2016-06-11 (C): withdraws the case, alternatively asks for a dismiss
- 2016-06-12 (CM): I pick up this case as CM, to handle a withdraw of this case
- 2016-06-22 (CM): informs parties about closure of case based on withdraw of the dispute
Private Part
Link to Arbitration case a20091117.4 (Private Part), Access for (CM) + (A) only
EOT Private Part
Discovery
The dispute was withdrawn by the claimant because of the time that has passed since the dispute and because of the respondent not being active in the according area any more. The withraw should only be understood in this sense.
No decision in any direction was done in this case.
Similiar Cases