. '''To Software''' '''[[Software|Software]]''' - '''To Software-Assessment - ''' '''[[Software/Assessment|Software/Assessment]]''' - '''To [[Software/Assessment/20111101-S-A-MiniTOP|previous meeting]]''' - '''To [[Software/Assessment/20111115-S-A-MiniTOP|next meeting]]''' ---- = Minutes of the MiniTOP on the 2011-11-08 = == Setting == The MiniTOP will be held via telco 22:00 CET Attendees: uli, dirk, magu, joost, michael == Topics == (skip to [[#AGENDA|agenda]]) Action items from last meeting '''[[Software/Assessment/ActionItems|Meeting Action Items]]''' <> == Agenda == 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=976|bug #976]] - database restructure preperation * raw transcript from meeting results: [[https://bugs.cacert.org/file_download.php?file_id=245&type=bug|sql structure modifications as discussed within meeting]] * New table to add: high potential domains to secure (mozilla blue print) * proposed testserver deployment - when ? * results from meeting 2011-10-18 * deletedwhen - to rename to deleted type datetime * from - to rename to creatorid * enum - or not enum for cca method * add table "mozilla blue print" domains * proposal michael: to add this as file, also to deploy to signer * sql update? or php script? * adding versioning number ? table verno, when type datetime * results from meeting 2011-10-25 * email addresses + domains verification on cert renewal: last verified (type datetime) * info from dirk regarding CCA table structure. structure defined in [[https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-devel/2009-06/msg00004.html]]. Current definition to compare with structure definition from mid 2009 * detailed discussion regarding CCA table * comment field to name as method? * type -> boolan * adding version table * latin-1 is db standard * sql script will be prepared by Michael * Update 1. script built by Michael 1. script reviewed by dirk 1. script tested localy, with one bug found (Org Client Cert - View doesn't work) 1. fix for Org Client Cert - View added to testserver, needs 2nd review 1. needs testing regarding notary table functions * notary table 0-150 pts variations tested manual and TMS assurances [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=976#c2682|Report #c2682]] 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] - New Points calculation / Thawte patch 1. The patch || Dirk, Michael || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] and [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=959|bug #959]] Thawte patch/Points-Count-Order-Change project || related bug 959: needs 1 more test, needs 2nd review / 2nd review: also check -x / tests done, needs 2nd review<
>959 {g} reviewed, deployed <
>827 {g} reviewed, deployment in 2 steps<
>deployed, report from Wytze || {g} <
> {0} || * dirk needs results from arbitration [[https://wiki.cacert.org/Arbitrations/a20100822.1|a20100822.1]] request to magu * dirk sent update 2011-10-18: michael transfered to testserver * michael: sql injection of one notary record: date < 30.8.2006, awarded=0, points=35 * test: 10.php: 35 points, 15.php shows 0 points => bug not fixed * problem was reported by Hans, needs to be fixed: awarded = 0, points = 35, assurance date < 1.9.2006 * there still exist 2 notary table records for test purposes to check this bug || script || 10.php || 15.php || 43old || 43new || || assuree's view<
>assurances received || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || || assurer's view<
>assurances given || 35 pts {g} || 0 pts {r} || 35 pts {g} || 0 pts {r} || * problem awarded = 0, points = 35 -> assurances given wrong calculation * dirk checks 15.php * new patch by dirk, michael transfered to testserver, marcus tested: 15.php ok * fix for 43.php needs to be fixed too || dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=882|bug #882]] || display Assurance when field in list of assurances received, assurances given by a user in admin console interface<
>last update 2011-10-25 || {0} || * first test: ok * new fix for bug#827 * addtl. test: ok * michael: sql injection of two addtl. notary record: date < 30.8.2006, awarded=0, points=35 * problem solved with last update, update pushed to critical system, deployed || script || 10.php || 15.php || 43old || 43new || || assuree's view<
>assurances received || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || || assurer's view<
>assurances given || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || * Date problem: fixed by Michael 2011-11-01, needs 2nd review * identified 1 more problem: assurance date 2009, record displays yellow mark + italic * correction to date LT 2006-09-01 according to [[Arbitrations/a20091118.1|a20091118.1]] and [[Arbitrations/a20100822.1|a20100822.1]] by NEO for 15.php (bug #827) and 43.php (bug #882) * tests with assurance dates 2006-09-02, 2006-09-01, 2006-08-31, 2006-08-30 were successful 1. PR work - Update? 1. newsletter mailing: ok from board [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20111016.2|m20111016.2]] and [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20111023.2|m20111023.2]] 1. newsletter reviewed English revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation]] 1. translations in progress 1. script sql query to prepare based on events/oa mailing * request for statement by critical team * proposal by critical team: a. to pace the email sending out a bit, e.g. by doing a chunk of 1000, then waiting 19 minutes (by a programmatic sleep) before starting the next chunk of 1000 etc a. pushing out the whole mailing will take somewhere between one and two full days a. reduce Postfix' maximal_queue_lifetime from the default 5 days to say 2 days a. Basically [[Arbitrations/a20100309.1|a20100309.1]] already gives permission for this mailing, except that it outlines a somewhat different technical implementation of such mailings. But policy-wise there doesn't seem to be a difference to me with what we are proposing here, so why bother with addtl arbitration? 1. Software-Assessors / developers to prepare a sql-query that can handle above requirements, also to handle localy translateded text * script to use from events + OA mailing, SA's to build a sql query, sending to critical team * Update ? 1. translations, reviews 1. newsletter reviewed English revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation]] 1. newsletter translated, reviewed German revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation/DE|German]] 1. newsletter translated, reviewed Dutch revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation/NL|Dutch]] 1. newsletter translated, reviewed French revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation/FR|French]] 1. newsletter translated, reviewed Spanish revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation/ES|Spanish]] 1. newsletter translated Russian revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation/RU|Russian]] needs 2nd review 1. newsletter script * dirk: script not yet deployed, will do till last weekend, Sunday: not yet written 1. "Special case" - handling of 0:0 cases under arbitration * New proposal: scripted mailing for 0:0 F2F cases with detailed instructions 1. get information how many 0:0 cass we have ? * info from last years arbitration [[Arbitrations/a20100822.1|a20100822.1]] ? (documentation is not yet avail) * Lambert as Arbitrator, Martin as Case Manager and dirk in role as SA as Claimant should know the answer 1. is it possible to update 15.php script to signal the 0:0 F2F assurance cases ?!? eg by color blue or background color light yellow ? * dirk: 15.php can be easily upgraded - not only color also italic 1. to prepare an arbitration process for a scripted mailing announcement a. to the assuree's who may loose points caused by 0:0 cases a. to the assurers, who can re-apply their assurance over assuree's with the 0:0 problem 1. arbitration initiated 1. wiki faq created: [[FAQ/NewPointsCount#YellowLines]] 1. No CM/A picked up this case yet 1. Questions from last 7 meetings: * dirk: when will 827 goes to production ? 1. Testers workqueue 1. Translingo [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=985|bug #985]] . [[https://translations.cacert.org]] ([[http://translations.cacert.org/]]) (replacement for translingo) . the translingo.cacert.org had been in operation far longer, so I think it is possible that some users migrated to translingo.cacert.org, without telling us. . I would suggest to mass-mail the email addresses of the translation-project leaders in the translingo database, to inform them, and to ask them to speak up if they still need it * last foreign uploads 2008 on about 13 + cacert projects * whohas translingo server console access? * mario * req for console access for michael to contact project leaders, Updates? * Transfer In, Transfer Out problems * Update from new deployment ? * opened for: create an account can now be started * Michael current state: * import and export routine works * script to incorporate updates needs fixed * next: complete language handling needs to be updated * accept lang handler needs fix * FF de, de_de * IE 6 de, 8,9 de_de * working session within last meeting: michael, marcus * infos from meeting 2011-10-18 * pdf code needs rewrite (uni code library, move to external server (outsourcing)) * message cert notification - uses perl code, text source not avail (get bind-text-domain) * current state? * Marcus sent mailing to translators, no response so far, no tests so far (week 2) 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=894|bug#894]] "Haeckchen bug" - review done, changes needs reviewed again || 3 || Dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=894|bug#894]] assure someone patches (checkbox) || (incl wot.php changes)<
>tested by 2, needs 2nd review, deploy<
>new test round || {0} || ? / u1 / m1 || * review by dirk in session, review ok * needs testing * Update? * No tests this week (week 2) 1. needs testing (summary) * 976 table notary funcctions * 985 translingo, needs 2nd test, eg mails, needs review * no tests reported * 894 Haeckchen bug * no tests reported * 827 new points count (year 2006), needs review (-> dirk) 1. Build + Document Emergency Patches Path || Build + Document Emergency Patches Path || Andreas, Uli, Wytze || {0} || * [[Software/Assessment/Documentation/EmergencyPatches]] * Documentation written, reviewed by Wytze * other reviews done ? 1. Michaels workqueue 1. New function to TMS - edit notary table record * [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=980|bug #980]] * infos from last meeting * testers needs editing individual notary records: fields "method", "awarded", "points" * easier to create notary records with testserver (add F2F), and edit existing record, doesn't need to check for assurer-from, assuree-to and so on * Update? 1. Dirks workqueue - The List of open / running / unhandled bugs 1. VBscript for Vista/Win7 (select keysize >= 1024) - '''reminder''' to dirk || x^1^ Dirk, new [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]]<
>DEV: [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=918|bug#918 (Part II)]] ([[Arbitrations/a20110312.1|a20110312.1]]) Weak keys: /pages/account/.. 4.php, 17.php to combine ? (/includes/keygen.php) '''DEV''' || current state: test /account/4.php added to testserver<
>Marcus will do detailed tests on Wed<
>some references added to [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]] || {-} || * as part of * x^1^ Arbitration case [[Arbitrations/a20110312.1|a20110312.1]] Weak keys [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=918|bug #918]] / [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=954|bug #954]] / [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]] * Current state: || {g} || pre mailing sent || || {g} || keys revocation script to bulk revoke weak keys, new [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=954|bug #954]], finished || || {-} || dirk: DEV: [[Arbitrations/a20110312.1|a20110312.1]] [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=918|bug#918]] Weak keys: /pages/account/.. 4.php, 17.php to combine ? (/includes/keygen.php) '''DEV''' <
>vbscript needs to be improved with select box key size and lower limit to 2048 (based on [[https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:MD5and1024]])<
>Api CertEnroll (MS crypto provider)<
>new [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]]<
>current state: test /account/4.php added to testserver<
>Marcus will do detailed tests on Wed<
>some references added to [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]] || || {g} || Weak keys blog post, published || || {g} || Weak keys article published by Hanno(July 28), link is in CAcert's blog post (July 30) || || {b} || weak keys: problems with cryptostick (to test at [[events/FrOSCon2011|Froscon]] with Juergen ?) || * cert enroll infos under [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]] * vista and win7 works with other engine !CryptoAPI (?) => Cryptography API: Next Generation * [[http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa833130%28v=VS.85%29.aspx]] * Marcus: added notes for Win7 [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964#c2249]] * dirk: has not started the virtual machine * Question from Marcus: did someone contacted illuminat? * No, Marcus: to contact illuminat * Update? 1. Advertising 1. Prepare Advertising fix for testserver - '''reminder''' to dirk || Dirk || Advertising (from last board meeting), [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=958|bug #958]] || add changes as discussed in last meeting to testserver || {0} || * [[CAcertInc/LogosForSale/Rules]] wiki link exist * "buy me" logo / "Logo For Sale" logo / "Monthly Auction on Logos" logo * Logos and Links exist, needs deployment to testserver * Update ? 1. Bugs rejected in review 2 || 2 || uli, ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=794|bug #794]] || visibility over certificates for sysadm in account administration, new update 2011-09-24 || {-} || ? / u1 / m1 || * shorten ttl for certs on testserver modification? * update? || 9 || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=823|bug #823]] email address removal fix || No warning when removing e-mail adres from acount that certificates will be revoked<
>checked by 4, needs 2nd review, deploy || {-} || ? / u9 / m9|| * update? 1. Bugs to Review #1, transfer to testserver - Currently '''4''' || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=977|bug #977]] admin console text fix || admin console Sysadmin - find domain - lists 2 tables - one for user accounts, one for org accounts, naming issue || {0} || || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=967|bug #967]] OA isassurer check || Give an OA the oppertuntiy to check if a desiginated Organisation Admininistrator is a CAcert assurer || {0} || || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=859|bug #859]] admin console interface || feature request: show activity on an account in the admin interface, new update /!\ || {0} || || inopiae || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=981|bug #981]] OA overview (dupe of [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=943|bug #943]]) || New layout of view for Organisation Administraors in account/id35 || {0} || 1. Bugs under testing: - Currently '''4''' || || neo || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=985|bug #985]] move translingo to translations || check language settings under testserver || {0} || || || || inopiae || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=920|bug #920]] Join - single name only (eg Indonesian) || details under bug number || {0} || || || || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=855|bug #855]] admin console interface "unknown" + "empty" assurance method fields, needed for correct testing on testserver || admin console lists "empty" and "Unknown" assurance types on listing given Assurances || {0} || || || 3 || Dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=894|bug#894]] assure someone patches (checkbox) || (incl wot.php changes)<
>tested by 2, needs 2nd review, deploy<
>new test round || {0} || ? / u1 / m1 || 1. Needs 2nd review + transfer to Critical team, to bundle, to deploy - Currently '''4 (!!!)''' * define priority eg. 10,2, and so on * proposed order: from 1 to 10 || 5 || uli, ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=968|bug #968]] error logging cleanup (splitted bug #909) || split 0000909: too many error messages logged - part II - general.php<
>create certs,certs,certs<
>2 sessions: 2011-09-21 + 2011-09-25<
>more tests needed<
>create certs,certs,certs,certs<
>create client, server, gpg keys, org client and server certs || {0} || ? / u4 / m5|| || 7 || uli, ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=789|bug #789]] OA edit domain fix || Editing domain for organisations does not work<
>new update 2011-09-26 || {0} || ? / u7 / m7|| || 8 || Ted, uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=957|bug #957]] Resize the comment field on [[https://secure.cacert.org/account.php?id=27]] so more information is visible || last update 2011-08-19<
>tested 3 times<
>ready to deploy? || {0} || ? / u8 / m8 || || 10 || uli, Ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=965|bug #965]] 0000965: Outsource / fix Webdb text pages id=12, 13 || addtl. id=37, id=38, new update 2011-09-25 || {0} || ? / u10 / m10 || * #1 reviewed and transfered by Michael within meeting 1. Needs development, deployment, discussion 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=835|bug #835]] Migrate CATS onto testserver || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=835|bug #835]] Assurer challenge (on testserver) || asssigned to Ted, CATS to install on ca-mgr1, awaiting deployment || {0} || 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=943|bug #943]] change OA admin/assurer text || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=943|bug #943]] change OA admin/assurer text || -> Ted, rejected, needs comment from OAO || {-} || * webdb names OrgAdmins as OrgAssurers and names OrgAssurers as OrgAdmins. * patch takes account about this issue * problem with menu link Org Admin .. is Org Assurers menu * but this menu includes one addtl. link "View" that is available for Org Admins * and Org Admins with master flag to add new admins * master flag is not described in OAP (!) * addtl master flag to revoke ? * rename to "Org Administration" * don't show menu to OrgAdmins * dupe bug# 981 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=824|bug #824]] Org User cert fix || uli, Ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=824|bug #824]] Org User cert fix || Organisation User Certificates: Need UI improvement for proper production usage<
>working session: needs to be removed from testserver, done<
>Case study || {0} || 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=988|bug #988]] TTP cap form deployment || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=988|bug #988]] TTP cap form deployment || Case study || {0} || 1. strategy plans ... next: strategy for "New Roots & Escrow" 1. idea: using indirect crl's ? * 2 crl's needed, one valid, one invalid crl server * more infos available ? who ? 1. build testserver with special certs 1. Magu, Michael to send instructions for test deployment * indirect CRL: RFC 5280 [[http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280]] (chapter 5) * meetings ago we've defined Testing requirements and a potential testszenario * to remind every meeting * Michael: testserver environment deployment 1. policy group: define requirements * multimember escrow method ? * needs risk analyze * potential candidates ? * Marcus to contacted Benedikt, will contact Thomas K * Next step(s) 1. how does debian work ? * defered to Froscon (end of Aug), CCCcamp (around Aug 10th) 1. CI (Update) 1. [[http://live.eclipse.org/node/1031|description to eclipse testpage]], [[http://adobedev.adobe.acrobat.com/p4101brizwr/|Webinar]] * deployment scenario: 1. create testusers 1. testing 1. delete testusers * regression test for standard tests: eg 0,1,49,50,51,99,100,101 pts w/ and w/o CATS passed * reminder 1. Jubula Test-Tool (by Michael) - update? * [[http://www.eclipse.org/jubula/download.php]] * instructions see under [[Software/Assessment/20110830-S-A-MiniTOP#Minutes|Minutes meeting 2011-08-30]] * test deployment needs to be continued by software testers * Jubula documentation started: [[Software/Jubula]] 1. new proposal by Sven: Webdriver with Maven and Jenkins-CI 1. Jubula vs. Webdriver 1. testserver variants 1. testserver for manual tests 1. testserver of OS and application upgrades 1. testserver for CI 1. test methods 1. unit test * test single modules, exceptions 1. integration tests * test interaction of modules 1. system tests * complete system test, with database interactions, module interactions and much more 1. sven did some work regarding frontendtest (Webdriver with Maven and Jenkins-CI) * Michael did some review: probably needs some seperation 1. Infrastructure seperation * info from funkfeuer.at * proposal by mario: * buy new machine: sample proposal alternate individual pieces: Euro 1042 . (1x Rasurbo BC-10, 1x Intel® DB65ALB3, 1x Intel® Core™ i7-2600, 4x Kingston ValueRAM DIMM 8 GB ECC, 2x Western Digital WD2002FAEX 2 TB) * infos from meeting 2011-10-18 * other hosting providers * hetzner: 50 euro server + setup 150 euro once + ip's: 22 euro * funkfeuer: + ip's: unknown * ip's needed: 24-30 * 3 motions from within last board meeting 2011-11-06 1. I move that board supports the infrastructure seperation project to find hosting for CAcerts non-critical infrastructure seperated from the hosting which is defined under SP for critical systems. * carried 1. Resolved, that CAcert Inc. prefers not to be contractor for infrastructure hosting and encourages the project team to liase with organisations like secure-u e.V. to be party of the contract. (they can sign a contract … just not in CAcert's name) * carried 1. Resolved, that CAcert Inc. encourages the project team to find sponsors for funding the project. * carried 1. next meeting: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 22:00 == Minutes == 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] - New Points calculation / Thawte patch 1. The patch || Dirk, Michael || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] and [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=959|bug #959]] Thawte patch/Points-Count-Order-Change project || related bug 959: needs 1 more test, needs 2nd review / 2nd review: also check -x / tests done, needs 2nd review<
>959 {g} reviewed, deployed <
>827 {g} reviewed, deployment in 2 steps<
>deployed, report from Wytze || {g} <
> {0} || * Date problem: fixed by Michael 2011-11-01, needs 2nd review * identified 1 more problem: assurance date 2009, record displays yellow mark + italic * correction to date LT 2006-09-01 according to [[Arbitrations/a20091118.1|a20091118.1]] and [[Arbitrations/a20100822.1|a20100822.1]] by NEO for 15.php (bug #827) and 43.php (bug #882) * tests with assurance dates 2006-09-02, 2006-09-01, 2006-08-31, 2006-08-30 were successful * discussion to merge #827 + #882 * next steps 1. review #827 + #882 fix-date 2006-09-01 -> dirk 1. mailing script not yet prepared -> dirk * ascending user id's with high watermark file 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=976|bug #976]] - database restructure preperation * raw transcript from meeting results: [[https://bugs.cacert.org/file_download.php?file_id=245&type=bug|sql structure modifications as discussed within meeting]] * added to testserver, migration script works * problem with org client certs view (org table) identified fixed. * further tests with notary table revealed no more problems * accounts/18.php needs review * instructions for running the script is written in bug #976 docu 1. bug #920 - givenname only * some discussion 1. Policy group discussion - Extended key usage * some instructions to michael, to prepare vote on CPS change 1. Testers workqueue 1. Translingo [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=985|bug #985]] * no tests this week 1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=894|bug#894]] "Haeckchen bug" - review done, changes needs reviewed again * no tests this week 1. several discussion from the floor 1. RDL prob - contacting Software Freedom Law center 1. OCSP server - timeout 10 min too short, 3 days to long, recommendation is 24-48 hours max, verisign: 7 days, startssl: 2d 1. dirk reviews: 1. bug 827 + bug 882 1. bug 976 1. Build + Document Emergency Patches Path || Build + Document Emergency Patches Path || Andreas, Uli, Wytze || {0} || * [[Software/Assessment/Documentation/EmergencyPatches]] * Documentation written, reviewed by Wytze * Michael: reminder for review [[Software/Assessment/Documentation/EmergencyPatches]] 1. Infrastructure seperation * info from funkfeuer.at * proposal by mario: * buy new machine: sample proposal alternate individual pieces: Euro 1042 . (1x Rasurbo BC-10, 1x Intel® DB65ALB3, 1x Intel® Core™ i7-2600, 4x Kingston ValueRAM DIMM 8 GB ECC, 2x Western Digital WD2002FAEX 2 TB) * infos from meeting 2011-10-18 * other hosting providers * hetzner: 50 euro server + setup 150 euro once + ip's: 22 euro * funkfeuer: + ip's: unknown * ip's needed: 24-30 * 3 motions from within last board meeting 2011-11-06 1. I move that board supports the infrastructure seperation project to find hosting for CAcerts non-critical infrastructure seperated from the hosting which is defined under SP for critical systems. * carried 1. Resolved, that CAcert Inc. prefers not to be contractor for infrastructure hosting and encourages the project team to liase with organisations like secure-u e.V. to be party of the contract. (they can sign a contract … just not in CAcert's name) * carried 1. Resolved, that CAcert Inc. encourages the project team to find sponsors for funding the project. * carried * Hosting: 50 Euro + 22 Euro addtl. IPs * 2x 3 TB, 16 GB RAM DDR3 * Backup space: 100 Gb * addtl Enterprise + 20 Euro a. Enterprise: ECC RAM, Enterprise HDD a. Basic: non-ECC RAM, consumer HDD * crypted partitions ? host? vservers? 1. next meeting: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 22:00 ==== Fixed Action Items since last or within meeting ==== ---- ==== Action Items New ==== Action items: '''[[Software/Assessment/ActionItems|Meeting Action Items]]''' <> ---- . CategorySoftwareAssessment