. To '''[[Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes| Meeting Agendas & Minutes]]''' - '''[[Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/ActionItems|Current Action Items]]''' - ''' Back to [[OverviewProjectsBoard|Projects Board Overview]]''' ---- Table of Contents <> ---- ## <> == 1.1 Software Assessment == ||'''1.1 Software Assessment'''|| {*} || ||<60%>Building Software Assessment Team ||<15%> [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20091220.2|m20091220.2]] ||<10%> 2009-12-24||<4%> {0} ||<7%> ||<4%> || || Arbitrated Background Check Alexander Prinsier || {-} init || || || no CM, no A avail, face-2-face meeting schedules failed || || || Arbitrated Background Check Markus Warg; appointed to Software Assessment || [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20100222.3|m20100222.3]] || 2010-02-26 || (./) || || || || Build up test maschine by critical sysadmin team ||done || || (./) || || || || Documentation Build up test maschine by critical sysadmin team ||done || || (./) || || || || Recovery Process to Build up test maschine from Documentation || || || {+} || || || || Setup a repository (SVN) ||done || || (./) || || || || repository test SVN ||failed || || {-} || || || || Setup a repository (GIT) ||done || || (./) || || || || repository test GIT, ongoing tests ||success || || (./) || || || || Setup a Testserver ||done / at ... || || (./) || || || || Deploy a Testserver Mgmt Environment || 2010-04-15 || 2010-08-18 || (./) || || || || Testing Testserver and Testserver Mgmt Environment || 2010-08-04 || 2010-09-21 || {+} || || || || Test with first software patch ||2010-09-21 || 2010-09-27 || {+} || || || || Build transfer Package from software patch || 2010-09-25 || 2010-10-07 || {+} || || || || Build and document the transfer process of Software patches || 2010-10-27 || || {0} || || || || ... || || || || || || || '''Dependent''' || '''on 1.1 are''' || '''1.4''' || '''2.1''' || '''3.1''' || <
> . '''Notes''' . m20091220.2 - 2009-12-24 - Request to propose new Software Assessment team members . That, the board is of the opinion that more software assessment members are needed, and, requests the Software Assessment Team Leader to propose new members (Dirk Astrath, Markus Warg, Bernhard Froehlich and Alexander Prinsier) for addition to the Software Assessment Team, and asks that ABCs be requested as soon as possible. . . Philipp G 2010-01-16 . have been asked (m20091220.2) to propose new team members for the Software Assessment team. I talked to the suggested candidates, roughly evaluated their qualifications and time-budgets, and came to the conclusion that we should start the process with Alexander Prinsier and Markus Warg. Therefore please start the arbitrated Background Checks on Alexander Prinsier and Markus Warg now. . '''Status''' . Transfer process needs to be deployed and documented. . Proposals: Process of Software Assessment * [[https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Software/SoftwareAssessment/Software-Assessment-Project-20100311-2.jpg|Software Assessment Process Variant #1]] * [[https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Software/SoftwareAssessment/Software-Assessment-Project-20100311-3.jpg|Software Assessment Process Variant #2]] * [[https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Software/SoftwareAssessment/Software-Assessment-Project-20100317-1.jpg|Software Assessment Process Variant #3]] . [[Software/Assessment|Projects Starting Page]] . [[Software|Software]] . [[Software/Assessment/Documentation/UpdateCycle|Description of Software Development Update Cycle (Proposal)]] == 1.2 Software Development == ||'''1.2 Software Development'''|| || ||<60%>Building Software Development Team ||<15%> ||<10%> ||<4%> (!) ||<7%> ||<4%> || || ... || || || || || || || ... || || || || || || || ... || || || || || || . '''Status''' . [[Software/DevelopmentTeam|Software Development Team]] . Not started / Developers team not yet build ... ? == 1.3 Software Test Team == ||'''1.3 Software Test Team'''|| || ||<60%>Building Software Test Team ||<15%>2010-08-04 ||<11%>2010-08-18 ||<4%> {+} ||<6%> ||<4%> || . '''Status''' . Building Test Team: finished == 1.4 Change Point Count System == ||'''1.4 Change Point Count System (Thawte Patch) - Deadline Nov 16th 2010'''^x1^ || {*} || ||<60%>Change the points count system ||<15%> ||<10%> ||<4%> {0} ||<7%> {1} ~-1.1-~ ||<4%> || || Updates for critical system || written || || (./) || || || || Testing to the critical system || 2010-10-08 || || {0} || || || || Move to the critical system || || || {-} || || || . '''Status''' . {1} depends on 1.1 software assessment project . * depends on software updates to the critical system - which ones ?? . ^x1)^ Deadline relates to the end of Thawte Points transfer program as of removal of the 150 points received by the Points transfer. Each transfered Member/Assurer needs to do '''re-assurances''' receiving Assurance points and also by doing Assurances to receive experience points. This needs to be communicated to the community. == 1.5 New Software - BirdShack == ||'''1.5 New Software - BirdShack'''|| {o} || ||<60%>New development of the critical system ||<15%> ||<10%> ||<4%> ||<7%> ||<4%> || ||[[AGM/TeamReports|Team Reports AGM ]] || || || || || || ||[[https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-board/2009-04/msg00069.html|LibreSSL's review for Audit-Innsbruck meeting ]] || || || || || || ||[[https://dev.cacert.cl/wiki/birdshack|BirdShack Project-Site ]] || || || || || || ||[[https://dev.cacert.cl/wiki/birdshack/Architecture|BirdShack Architecture ]] || || || || || || ||[[Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/20091220|Minutes 2009-12 Process of Software Review ยง2.3 ]] || || || || || || ||[[https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-policy/2009-11/msg00268.html|dual control in these cases ]] || || || || || || ||[[https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Software/Meetings/20091216-Essen/20091216-Software-MiniTOP-Essen.html|repository and change control ]] || || || || || || ||[[Technology/Laboratory/Software/BirdShack|Inputs & Thoughts ]] || || || || || || . '''Notes''' . During CeBIT 2009 discussions between PD, Ian and Mario discovered that the current CAcert software (libressl) might be hard to maintain. . For doing more investigation on this, these three plus Alejandro met up in Innsbruck for a week for digging into it. . Analysing the current software revealed that the software had grown by time and is not well designed and possibly would not stand an audit. . . '''Status''' . stagnent . '''re new software''' . Which other project is related to "new software" beside 1.5? ---- ''' Back to [[OverviewProjectsBoard|Projects Board Overview]]''' ---- . CategoryProjects