• Arbitrations
• a20141003.1

• Case Number: a20141003.1
• Status: init
• Claimant: Werner D (as support team member)
• Respondent: CAcert

• initial Case Manager: EvaStöwe

• Case Manager: name case manager
• Arbitrator: name arbitrator
• Date of arbitration start: 201Y-MM-DD
• Date of ruling: 201Y-MM-DD
• Case closed: 201Y-MM-DD
• Complaint: change of name parts
• Relief: TBD

Before: Arbitrator name arbitrator (A), Respondent: CAcert (R), Claimant: Werner D (as support team member) (C), Case: a20141003.1

History Log

• 2014-10-03 (issue.c.o): case [s20141003.4]
• 2014-10-03 (iCM): returned the ticket back to Support with the question if the case would match the precedents case a20110213.1 which could be handled by Support, else the differences need to be given
• 2014-10-03 (C): discribes the support-case in more detail
• 2014-11-03 (iCM): added to wiki, request for CM / A

Private Part

• Link to Arbitration case a20141003.1 (Private Part), Access for (CM) + (A) only

EOT Private Part

original Dispute

•  Hello Arbitrators,
  
  I file a dispute to decide if I can change the assignment of name parts to
  name fields of a CAcert account. Nothing is changed or added or deleted, only
  which name part goes to which name field.
  
  I regard it similar and milder to
  http://wiki.cacert.org/Support/Handbook/PrecedentCases/a20110213.1 and
  http://wiki.cacert.org/Support/Handbook/PrecedentCases/a20110119.1. Maybe it
  could be embraced to one of them or you could say I can freely do so.

A split from the original support ticket was provided with the dispute. It containt part of the conversation between the member who wants to have the order of the names changed and support.

Discovery

Ruling

Execution

Similiar Cases

to be completed

• CategoryArbitration

• CategoryArbCaseAccountDataNameOrder