• Case Number: a20091128.1
• Status: dismissed
• Claimants: J. Steijlen
• Respondents: Wil van Ham

• Case Manager: Mario Lipinski

• Arbitrator: UlrichSchroeter

• Date of arbitration start: 2010-08-30
• Date of ruling: 200Y-MM-DD
• Case closed: 2010-11-22
• Complaint: mismatch between account and document (nickname)

Today I met Willem van Ham in Utrect. (HCC-days)

Upon assuring him I noticed a mismatch between account and document.
Documents state "Willem van Ham", account states "Wil van Ham".

"Will" is quite a common varitation on the name "Willem".
I request that the name on his account is changed to "Willem van Ham".

Another assurer Jacob K (<email anonymized>) also assured him.

Yes I accept the CCA&DRP

Greetings Joost

• Relief: TBD

Before: Arbitrator UlrichSchroeter (A), Respondent: Wil van Ham (R), Claimant: J. Steijlen (C), Case: a20091128.1

History Log

• 2009-11-28 (UlrichSchroeter): added to wiki, request for CM / A

• 2010-08-29 (CM): I'll take care about this case
• 2010-08-29 (A): I'll take care about this case
• 2010-08-30 (A): forwarded all mails to (CM)
• 2010-08-30 (A): sent initmailing with CCA / DRP req. to (C), (R)
• 2010-08-30 (C): accepted CCA / DRP in dispute filing. It is presumed that claimant Joost Steijlen in the role as support engineer accepts CCA, by role under SP.
• 2010-08-30 (A): (Support): please provide me with the list of assurances received and the full names seperated in fields on (R)'s account
• 2010-08-30 (R): I accept the arbritation.
• 2010-08-30 (Support): [s20100830.52] sends list with assurances received by (R) and the full names in account
• 2010-08-30 (A): explanation of dutch country variation with req to decide which option (R) prefers sent to (R)
• 2010-08-30 (A): position of Tussenvoegsel is located in middlename field, that has some problems. explaining (R) the pro's and con's for correction
• 2010-08-30 (R): certs date from (A) seems to be invalid
• 2010-08-30 (A): support on CRL's to (R)
• 2010-08-30 (R): is it possible to loose the 35 assurance points regarding this arbitration case ?
• 2010-08-30 (A): answer to (R)'s question, regarding dutch common short name variation
• 2010-08-31 (C): accepted CCA / DRP
• 2010-09-11 (A): case gots stuck by communication problems ... so send a reminder to (R) that I'm awaiting (R)'s response to my 2 still open questions: a) country variation on givenname b) Tussenvoegsel problem in account name
• 2010-09-11 (R): bothered by burocration, Delete my account
• 2010-09-11 (A): response on last (R)'s email
• 2010-09-11 (A): call 4 assistance from dutch community (other arbitrators)
• 2010-09-13 (R): It seems to be that there wil be a event in germany. There are several points on the agenda, also the callname in the Netherlands. I'll wait for that.

• 2010-10-09 (A): request for clarification regarding Nederlandse Voornamen Databank sent to (C)

• 2010-10-10 (A): summary current state regarding Nederlandse Voornamen Databank sent to (R)

• 2010-10-18 (C): sends response about his PoV regarding Nederlandse Voornamen Databank

• 2010-11-19 (A): summary on current state with two possible options, sent to (C), with request how (C) will decide
• 2010-11-19 (C): Revoke the dispute filing.

Discovery

• 5 assurances received before 2008-02-01

• Name has a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tussenvoegsel in name. There is one closed arbitration case that handles positioning of Tussenvoegsel: a20090618.9

• Nederlandse Voornamen Databank search results:

  • willem -> Wilhelm -> naam uit Wil- wil' (zie wil-) en helm'

  • Wil -> Verkorting van (een variant van) Wilhelm (m.) of Wilhelmina (vr.). Zie ook Wille.

  • Wille -> Verkorting van namen met Wil-, vnl. Wilhelm.

  • Will -> Zie Wil. Ook Eng. naam, verkorting van William (alleen m. naam).

• (C) confirms to the to the relaxed name variation on PracticeOnNames

  • Known Country Variations: * NL

  • based on the Nederlandse Voornamen Databank

• Since dispute filing, the name handling was in flux and has been moved to the more relaxed ruling

Ruling

Execution

• 2010-11-22 (A): Case dismissed.
• 2010-11-22 (A): Sent notice to (C), (R), asking (R) if he accepts this outcome.

Similiar Cases

---

• CategoryArbitration

• CategoryArbCaseAccountDataNameMismatch