• Case Number: a20090717.2
• Status: Closed
• Claimants: Ulrich Schroeter
• Respondents: Sabine B

• Case Manager: BernhardFröhlich

• Arbitrator: Martin Gummi

• Date of arbitration start: 2010-06-14
• Date of ruling: 2010-11-14
• Case closed: 2011-03-02
• Complaint:

The complete mail is filed at The Dispute Mailing List Archive (lower part of the message)

Hi,

i hereby file a dispute against the account with the email address
        f...@bilkinfo.de

I have met Sabine B, born E at Linuxtag Berlin in the
face-2-face meeting at the booth at June 26th.
I'd verified the name on the CAP against the name in her ID document
(German Personalausweis, Bahncard).
The name on the IDcard:     Sabine B geb. E 
The name in the account:    Sabine E (B) 

Sabine tells us at the booth, that there is a known problem
in correct the ID documents, cause of missing general
documents (thats a private problem).
As it seems, there is no quick govermental solution,
there is a need, to correct the account to the naming
shown on the ID documents:
   from  Sabine E (B)
   to    Sabine B geb. E


As the Assuree has yet 100 assurance points and 24 experience points
(124 in total) something seems to be wrong.



I, Ulrich Schroeter makes a reliable statement related to the CARS program
as stated in
https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Assurance/Minutes/20090517MiniTOP.html
under "Reliable Statement" that i've met Sabine B geb. E at
June 26th, 2009
at the booth of Linuxtag Berlin 2009 in a face-to-face meeting.
I made an assurance and wrote down all names found on the German IDcard
(Personalausweis)

Givenname(s):  Sabine
Surname     :  B geb. E

The assurance was conducted under the Assurance Policy including the
CAcert Community Agreement, signed by Sabine B geb. E.

• Relief: TBD

Before: Arbitrator Martin Gummi (A). Respondent: Sabine B (R) Claimant: UlrichSchroeter (C) Case: a20090717.2

History Log

• 2010-06-14 (A): care about case a20090717.2
• 2010-06-15 (CM): Sent initiating mail
• 2010-06-16 (C): accepts CCA/DRP under this arbitration
• 2010-06-17 (R): accepts CCA/DRP under this arbitration
• 2010-06-20 (CM): Assurer Nikolas P. confirms R's name as Sabine B.
• 2010-06-20 (CM): Assurer Daniel R. confirms R's name as Sabine B.
• 2010-06-20 (CM): Assurer Fabian S. confirms R's name as Sabine B. (but used the abbreveated family name in his confirmation...)
• 2010-07-16 (C): progress report request to (CM), (A)
• 2010-07-28 (C): progress report request to (CM), (A)
• 2010-07-29 (C): rcvd response from (CM)

  • Around June 20 (A) has forwarded me several mails from Assurers who 
    confirm Sabine's new name. I don't know what is still missing, but I 
    guess (A) has to make a statement himself.

• 2010-08-24 (C): progress report request to (CM), (A) again with some recommendations regarding Arbitrators assistance
• 2010-08-30 A requests Assurance details of R's account from Support
• 2010-08-30 Support replied with Assurance details
• 2010-09-15 Request for assistence to AS1, AS2, AS3

• 2010-11-14 Request for assistence to AS4 at OpenRheinRuhr2010

Discovery

• At Linuxtag (R) was assured by four different Assurers. Three of them witness the same name, one is not responding/assured sth. different.
  • Assurer
  • AS1 OK
  • AS2 OK
  • AS3 OK

• At OpenRheinRuhr2010 was assured by one Assurer

  • AS4 OK
• The problem has been identified by experienced Assurers and filed into Disputes
• Certificates issued after 2009-11-08 (date when CPS became draft) that include the name have to be revoked.
  • The certs problem on Name changes

    • The CPS comes to draft at Status: DRAFT p20091108

    • If the user has created client certificates, with the not yet corrected name in the account, the certs are probably built up with the wrong name from online account.

    • CPS 3.1.1. Types of names - Client Certificates. The Subscriber Naming consists of:

      • CN= The common name takes its value from one of:
        • For individual Members, a Name of the Subscriber, as Assured under AP.

Ruling

Based on the presented information. I hereby rule:

• Client Certificates, that are issued by (C) after 2009-11-08 and that includes the disputed name should be revoked
• name has to be changed as requested by the dispute

Oberhausen, Nov, 14th 2010

Execution

• 2010-11-14 (A) sent ruling to (C) (R) (CM) (Support)
• 2010-11-14 (A) exec. req. to (Support)
• 2010-11-14 (Support) [s20101114.35] exec. report
• 2011-03-02 (A): exec report to all participiants. Case closed.

Similar Cases

---

• CategoryArbitration

• CategoryArbCaseAccountDataNameMismatch