## page was renamed from Arbitrations/Meetings/ATAgendaandMinutes-20100601
. '''To Arbitration [[Arbitrations|Arbitrations]] - To Arbitration [[Arbitrations/Training|Training & Lessons]]'''
. '''Back to [[Arbitrations/Meetings|Arbitration Team Meetings]]'''
----
== Arbitration Team Meeting 2010-06-02 ==
. 1 '''Preliminaries'''
. 1.1 Chair opens the Committee Meeting
. 1.2 Accept the '''[[Arbitrations/Meetings/ATAgendaandMinutes-20100406| Minutes of the Arbitration Team Meeting 2010-04-06]]'''
. 1.3 Accept the '''[[Arbitrations/Meetings/ATAgendaandMinutes-20100428| Minutes of the last Arbitration Team Meeting 2010-04-28]]'''
. 2 '''Businesses''' - Important Note: '''Acceptance of Businesses 48 Hours before beginning of Arbitration Team Meeting latest!'''
.2.1 '''First preview of new Arbitration Mgmt System''' added by UlrichSchroeter
. Regarding Arbitration team meeting April 28th, topic 2.1 '''How to handle the arbitration cases wiki (Continued from [[Arbitrations/Meetings/ATAgendaandMinutes-20100317|meeting 2010-03-17]])''' that was added by Hans Verbeek, PD wants to present a software to handle arbitration cases with closed and public parts. A first presentation should be in the May meeting, but no May meeting did happen.
.2.2 '''What blocks the still open/running ABC's?''' added by UlrichSchroeter
|| [[Arbitrations/a20091117.4|a20091117.4]] || Nick, no CM, no A ||
|| [[Arbitrations/a20100113.2|a20100113.2]] || Alexander, no CM, no A ||
|| [[Arbitrations/a20100113.3|a20100113.3]] || Dirk, CM: Martin, A: Philipp, Interview did happen ||
|| [[Arbitrations/a20100223.1|a20100223.1]] || Nik, CM: Martin, A: Ulrich, Interview did happen, Transcript was written last week ||
.2.3 '''What is the status of the evidence kept in the ABC?''' added by UlrichSchroeter, original question by Iang
. What is the status of the evidence kept in the ABC? Can it be opened in any Arbitration? Or shall we place a limit on it that it can only be opened in a direct challenge to that ABC? Or should it not be kept at all? Or, the examination of the evidence should be performed by original Arbitrator, or an independent Arbitrator from the challenging case, and simple "yes, no" answers returned.
. The reason for this is that we want to use the ABC process to extract as much personal information from the individual concerned, and privacy is obviously a question. So it makes sense to cast as strong a ring of privacy as possible around that evidence.
. It might make sense that only future arbitrations that challenge the ruling of the ABC itself can re-open that evidence. That is, if some person in a trusted role turns out to not be trusted for the roles, to the extent that it challenges the declarations made in original ABC; rather than, just did a dodgy Assurance or wants a name change...
.2.4 '''There still exists 6 new dispute filings in ORTS ...''' added by UlrichSchroeter
* Dispute filings are moved into Disputes queue in ORTS 24.4., 7.5., 14.5., 19.5., 28.5., 30.5.
* Action task for all arbitrators was to request your own OTRS account to handle cases
* So please, all who did not manage a new dispute filing under OTRS, select one OTRS dispute filing and transfer it into the Wiki. Please follow instructions under [[Arbitrations/Training/Lesson04|Lesson 4 - Creating a new Arbitration case]]
.2.5 '''About Arbitration backlog''' added by PhilippDunkel
. 3 '''Question Time''' - Important Note: '''Questions from CAcert.org Community Members can be added until beginning of Arbitration Team Meeting! As well questions can be asked at "Question Time", without added Question here'''
. 3.1 "Question One" added by YourName ''- Comment: Replace "Question One" by Your Question and add your Name''
. et cetera
. 4 '''Closing'''
. 4.1 Confirm next Arbitration Team Meeting: Usually every 1st Tuesday and the 3rd Wednesday of the month, 20:00 UTC (19 CET).
* Wednesday, June 16th
. 4.2 Chair closes the Arbitration Team Meeting
. 4.3 Preparation of Minutes
<
>
== Minutes - Arbitration Team Meeting 2010-06-02 ==
<
>
==== Synopsis of Meeting Contents ====
* 20:00 chair opens meeting, 5 attendees (6 close before meeting end)
* Top 1: Minutes
. One remark: to add summary to the tops
* 1.2 Accepted the '''[[Arbitrations/Meetings/ATAgendaandMinutes-20100406| Minutes of the Arbitration Team Meeting 2010-04-06]]'''
* '''Summary: 4 ayes, 1 abstain'''
* 1.3 Accept the Minutes of the last [[Arbitrations/Meetings/ATAgendaandMinutes-20100428|Arbitration Team Meeting 2010-04-28]]
* '''Summary: minutes are not written yet by Martin, defered for the next meeting'''
* Top 2:
* 2.1 First preview of new Arbitration Mgmt System
* '''Summary: We received an email from PD that he hasn't finished the preview yet ... will present next meeting'''
* 2.2 What blocks the still open/running ABC's?
* Current state, we have 4 open/running ABC's
* Listed under listed under [[Arbitrations/Meetings/ATAgendaandMinutes-20100602]]
* ABC Nick and Alexander no CM / A has responded yet to take care about this case
* Problems and difficult to meet in person, i.e. Nick is living in the US, no Arbitrator there
* Dirks interview needs to be ruled by PD. PD: I sent this on to the board as finished quite a while ago. As soon as I actually get home I will resend it. As this is actually complete
* Nik's interview needs to be ruled by u60
* '''Summary:
* 1) difficult to meet, either direct or via video or phone
* 2) all arb cases slow, ABC is just one of them
* Questions araised about to do the interview face-2-face that couldn't be answered within the meeting: see [[https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Arbitration/BackgroundCheckProcedure.html#2.4_Interview]]'''
* 2.1 First preview of new Arbitration Mgmt System
* '''Summary: PD requests email addresses of the certs from Arbs'''
* 2.5 About Arbitration backlog:
* we need example cases for the simple ones :DoB , changes of middle names, to delete of an account
* check for one such case, select a few rulings regarding such a case, and propose a generic ruling?
* How about we create like a form for these frequent and simple cases? (accepted)
* A claimant would then fill it out with all the evidence that could be requested and a checkbox for the formalities
* Such a form case could then simply be double checked by an arbitrator and closed within a few minutes. In essence we have the claimant do all the work
* '''Summary: action request to PD: would you be able to create a proposal and send it to the arbitrators? We can then discuss it and either reject, amend and accept, or accept it without modifications. Make it "official"'''
* 2.3 What is the status of the evidence kept in the ABC?
* '''Summary: defered for next meeting'''
* 4.1 next meeting: Wednesday, June 16th
* 21:29 meeting closed
==== Meeting Transcript ====
* [[Arbitrations/Meetings/Transcripts/transcript-meeting-100602|Meeting Transcript 2010-06-02]] ([[https://wiki.cacert.org/Arbitrations/Meetings/Transcripts/Transcripts-Page-Template|Transcripts-Page-Template]])
<
>
----
== Inputs & Thoughts ==
. YYYYMMDD-YourName
. {{{
Text / Your Statements, thoughts and e-mail snippets, Please
}}}
----
. YYYYMMDD-YourName
. {{{
Text / Your Statements, thoughts and e-mail snippets, Please
}}}
----
. CategoryArbitration
. CategoryArbMeeting